Screen 03 · R-007 · Layers 05 & 07
Section 4.3 Governance · High weight · Owner P. Adeyemi · BID-2026-014
Describe your AI assurance approach against the EU AI Act, including GPAI classification, risk tiering, conformity assessment and post-market monitoring.
ClaimThe AI assurance approach classifies every model in scope against the EU AI Act GPAI thresholds, tiers each model against the Act's risk categories, applies conformity assessment appropriate to the tier and runs post-market monitoring with quarterly reporting to the buyer's model risk committee.
Evidence anchorEU AI Act GPAI assessment note EV-2026-0195 · Model inventory EV-2026-0196 · Post-market monitoring runbook EV-2026-0197.
ConfidenceMedium-high. GPAI classification and tiering are proven; conformity assessment at the highest tier requires a named conformity body which is buyer-selectable.
Counter-viewA competitor bidding under a lighter interpretation of the Act (for example classifying as limited-risk when the correct classification is high-risk) will show a leaner cost line; the response should lead with the correct classification and treat the cost delta as a governance premium.
EU AI Act GPAI assessment note EV-2026-0195
storage://evidence/EV-2026-0195.pdf
signed_by P. Adeyemi · 13 Aug 2026 · 6e22b8…04af
Model inventory EV-2026-0196
storage://evidence/EV-2026-0196.csv
signed_by J. Okonjo · 12 Aug 2026 · cc7314…b920
Post-market monitoring runbook EV-2026-0197
storage://evidence/EV-2026-0197.pdf
signed_by H. Lindqvist · 10 Aug 2026 · 1902ef…7ac5
Against a competitor known to classify GPAI as limited-risk, sharpen to we have classified this as high-risk and the buyer's regulator will thank us for it.